Triple
T30843669
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Longitude Act |
E785577
|
entity |
| Predicate | motivatedInnovation |
P4937
|
FINISHED |
| Object | marine chronometer |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: marine chronometer | Statement: [Longitude Act, motivatedInnovation, marine chronometer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: motivatedInnovation Context triple: [Longitude Act, motivatedInnovation, marine chronometer]
-
A.
motivatedResearchIn
Indicates that one entity inspired, drove, or provided the motivation for another entity to conduct a particular research activity or line of inquiry.
-
B.
motivated
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, drive, or incentive that causes another entity to act or behave in a certain way.
-
C.
innovation
Indicates the introduction or development of something new or significantly improved compared to existing methods, products, or ideas.
-
D.
innovationFrom
Indicates that something originates, arises, or is derived as an innovation from a particular source or prior entity.
-
E.
usedInnovation
Indicates that one entity applied or implemented an innovation (such as a new idea, method, or technology) in relation to another entity or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b850848190a4af4ccf8ddadcdf |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f69145041c81909275df4e885f090a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b7d2794819092fef8a63f4f3de8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:46 p.m.