Triple
T3081907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IETF Area Director |
E64276
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalNumberOfHolders |
P45757
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one or more per IETF Area |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one or more per IETF Area | Statement: [IETF Area Director, typicalNumberOfHolders, one or more per IETF Area]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalNumberOfHolders Context triple: [IETF Area Director, typicalNumberOfHolders, one or more per IETF Area]
-
A.
totalNumberOfHolders
Indicates the total count of distinct entities that hold or possess a given asset, item, or resource.
-
B.
sharesHeldBy
Indicates that a specified number or portion of shares is owned or held by a particular entity.
-
C.
numberOfHoldings
Indicates the quantity of distinct holdings or assets associated with an entity.
-
D.
eligibleHolders
Indicates which entities are permitted or qualified to hold or possess a given item, right, or role.
-
E.
majorityHolding
Indicates that one entity owns more than half of another entity’s voting shares or equity, giving it effective control over that entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857bb4c88190a4cf27893fcabed8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada1e70b9081908c801d084a6ae992 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:20 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9debb6308190be28378ae1fc98af |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada0f6fef48190b13898be383a246b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:03 p.m.