Triple
T30818903
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | بلاد الشام |
E784861
|
entity |
| Predicate | لغة_سائدة_تاريخياً |
P36041
|
FINISHED |
| Object | اللغة العربية |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: اللغة العربية | Statement: [بلاد الشام, لغة_سائدة_تاريخياً, اللغة العربية]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: لغة_سائدة_تاريخياً Context triple: [بلاد الشام, لغة_سائدة_تاريخياً, اللغة العربية]
-
A.
historicallySpokenIn
Indicates that a language was used for spoken communication in a particular place or region during a past historical period.
-
B.
historicalLanguage
Indicates that one language is a historical or earlier form/ancestor of another language.
-
C.
historicalLanguageOfBearers
Indicates that the specified language is historically spoken or used by the bearers of a given name, title, or designation.
-
D.
hasMajorityLanguageHistorically
chosen
Indicates that a particular language has historically been the predominant or majority language within a given entity or region.
-
E.
languageOfHistoricName
Indicates the language in which a historic or former name of an entity is expressed.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b4eda48190bd212ce4f3901e56 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6906b8f048190b3051f9ece75bd3a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b7d2794819092fef8a63f4f3de8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:44 p.m.