Triple
T30808557
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Artem Chigvintsev |
E784574
|
entity |
| Predicate | winnerWith |
P180257
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kara Tointon |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kara Tointon | Statement: [Artem Chigvintsev, winnerWith, Kara Tointon]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: winnerWith Context triple: [Artem Chigvintsev, winnerWith, Kara Tointon]
-
A.
winnerAssociated
Indicates that there is a relevant connection or affiliation between a winner and another entity in the context of a particular event or competition.
-
B.
winnerState
Indicates the state or condition of an entity that has achieved victory or been declared the winner in a given context.
-
C.
winnerMake
Indicates that one entity causes or brings about another entity becoming the winner in a contest, competition, or selection process.
-
D.
winnerRight
Indicates that the referenced entity is the winner on the right side or right position in a competitive or comparative context.
-
E.
wonBy
Indicates that a contest, game, or competition is decided in favor of a particular participant or side.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b3a7ec819096939414d103e31e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f739a638748190808e7a2930dce16e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f732f2dc6c8190a4e86da98cc5eb05 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:35 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f739a58b3c81908abc2b8738a65678 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:43 p.m.