Triple
T30806249
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jack Leiter |
E784506
|
entity |
| Predicate | isProspectFor |
P170802
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Texas Rangers |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas Rangers | Statement: [Jack Leiter, isProspectFor, Texas Rangers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isProspectFor Context triple: [Jack Leiter, isProspectFor, Texas Rangers]
-
A.
prospectStatus
Indicates the current stage or condition of a potential customer or lead within a prospecting or sales process.
-
B.
isPro
Indicates that an entity is a professional or expert in a particular field, activity, or domain.
-
C.
prospectRanking
Indicates the relative priority or desirability assigned to a prospect compared to other prospects.
-
D.
agingPotential
Indicates the capacity or suitability of something to improve, develop, or remain effective over time as it ages.
-
E.
hasPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses the capacity or possibility to develop, achieve, or exhibit a particular state, quality, or outcome in the future.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b3a7ec819096939414d103e31e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f695f9fe7c819084322bf6cdc70a13 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f690ed5d008190831cf8e44cce28af |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:03 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f695385a2881908cc28ef97fffc867 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:43 p.m.