Triple

T30801505
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Penal Code (1810) E784380 entity
Predicate legalPrincipleEmphasized P61937 FINISHED
Object legality of offences and penalties LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legality of offences and penalties | Statement: [Penal Code (1810), legalPrincipleEmphasized, legality of offences and penalties]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrincipleEmphasized
Context triple: [Penal Code (1810), legalPrincipleEmphasized, legality of offences and penalties]
  • A. legalConcept
    Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
  • B. principleClarified
    Indicates that a principle has been made clearer or more explicit, typically by explanation, refinement, or elaboration.
  • C. hasLegalPrincipleInvoked
    Indicates that a legal case, action, or decision relies on, cites, or is based upon a specific legal principle.
  • D. legalBasis
    Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
  • E. lawCharacteristicInText chosen
    Indicates that a specific legal characteristic or feature is expressed, described, or referenced within a given text.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224b3a7ec819096939414d103e31e completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe610e1f6881908f10070ba64643cf completed May 8, 2026, 10:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe604c6c008190ad659e9b9fa82f7b completed May 8, 2026, 10:14 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:42 p.m.