Triple

T30794655
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paraná (city) E784193 entity
Predicate hasNeighboringCityAcrossRiver P382 FINISHED
Object Santa Fe (city, Argentina) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Santa Fe (city, Argentina) | Statement: [Paraná (city), hasNeighboringCityAcrossRiver, Santa Fe (city, Argentina)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNeighboringCityAcrossRiver
Context triple: [Paraná (city), hasNeighboringCityAcrossRiver, Santa Fe (city, Argentina)]
  • A. locatedAcrossRiverFrom chosen
    Indicates that one entity is situated on the opposite side of a river relative to another entity.
  • B. borderedByCountryAcrossRiver
    Indicates that one country shares a border with another country, with the boundary specifically formed or separated by a river.
  • C. nearbyCountryAcrossRiver
    Indicates that one country is located close to another country with a river lying between them as a separating feature.
  • D. bordersAcrossRiver
    Indicates that two regions or entities share a boundary with each other that is separated or defined by a river.
  • E. hasCityOnRiver
    Indicates that a city is located on or along the course of a particular river.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224b2e2a48190b19aa43db9da5b67 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feba0f09508190b3e871c62b19ec7f completed May 9, 2026, 4:37 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feb957fe7c8190969fb31a6d1a59c8 completed May 9, 2026, 4:34 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:42 p.m.