Triple
T30782579
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bialla |
E783857
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedInPresentDayCounty |
P23957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pisz County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pisz County | Statement: [Bialla, locatedInPresentDayCounty, Pisz County]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: locatedInPresentDayCounty Context triple: [Bialla, locatedInPresentDayCounty, Pisz County]
-
A.
locatedInCountySeatOfCounty
Indicates that one entity is located in the county seat city or town of the specified county.
-
B.
locatedInPresentDayMunicipality
Indicates that an entity is situated within the boundaries of a specific municipality as it exists in the present day, regardless of historical administrative changes.
-
C.
locatedInCountyRegion
Indicates that one entity is geographically situated within the boundaries of a specific county or county-level region.
-
D.
isInCountySeatOf
Indicates that one entity is located within the town or city that serves as the administrative center (county seat) of a specified county.
-
E.
inCounty
chosen
Indicates that one entity is geographically or administratively located within the boundaries of a specified county.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b213c8819083886073f90b647e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0116ca6a1c81909a9e938dbe54eb8a |
completed | May 10, 2026, 11:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0116655e248190bdfe5b4bb4f1cf47 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 11:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:41 p.m.