Triple
T30781049
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Babe Ruth’s alleged called shot in Game 3 |
E783811
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRelationToPlayerReputation |
P202711
|
FINISHED |
| Object | enhanced Babe Ruth’s legend |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: enhanced Babe Ruth’s legend | Statement: [Babe Ruth’s alleged called shot in Game 3, hasRelationToPlayerReputation, enhanced Babe Ruth’s legend]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelationToPlayerReputation Context triple: [Babe Ruth’s alleged called shot in Game 3, hasRelationToPlayerReputation, enhanced Babe Ruth’s legend]
-
A.
hasPlayerDevelopmentReputation
Indicates that an entity is recognized for its effectiveness or reputation in developing players’ skills or careers.
-
B.
playableReputation
Indicates that an entity’s reputation status can be actively used or engaged with, such as being selected, controlled, or experienced within an interactive context.
-
C.
hasReputationAmong
Indicates that an entity is regarded or perceived in a particular way by a specified group or audience.
-
D.
relationshipToPlayer
Indicates the type of personal or social connection an entity has with the player.
-
E.
relationshipReputation
Indicates how one entity’s standing, trustworthiness, or esteem is perceived by another entity or within a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b213c8819083886073f90b647e |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00af6b3a948190a92813c13384c304 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00aec35610819085dd5137715a4228 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:13 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a00af6a5ffc819095c7331518a09f53 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:41 p.m.