Triple

T30774102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fujifilm X-H2 E783609 entity
Predicate companionModel P22642 FINISHED
Object Fujifilm X-H2S NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fujifilm X-H2S | Statement: [Fujifilm X-H2, companionModel, Fujifilm X-H2S]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: companionModel
Context triple: [Fujifilm X-H2, companionModel, Fujifilm X-H2S]
  • A. includesCompanion
    Indicates that one entity involves, contains, or is accompanied by another entity acting as a companion.
  • B. companionOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a companion or partner to another, typically accompanying or being closely associated with them.
  • C. companionChip
    Indicates that one entity serves as a companion or auxiliary chip to another, typically functioning alongside it to provide additional or supporting capabilities.
  • D. modeledWith
    Indicates that something is represented, simulated, or described using a particular model, method, or modeling technique.
  • E. compatibilityModel
    Indicates that one entity is defined or evaluated according to a specific compatibility framework, standard, or model in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224b1519081908b9db003fd2073e0 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7a225a77c81908f8953ccfeb14336 completed May 3, 2026, 7:29 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7a06d4f108190bae3ab9ae431d2c7 completed May 3, 2026, 7:22 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:40 p.m.