Triple

T30770790
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gulf of Sidra incident 1981 E783516 entity
Predicate legalStatusOfWaters P196587 FINISHED
Object disputed territorial claim by Libya LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: disputed territorial claim by Libya | Statement: [Gulf of Sidra incident 1981, legalStatusOfWaters, disputed territorial claim by Libya]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfWaters
Context triple: [Gulf of Sidra incident 1981, legalStatusOfWaters, disputed territorial claim by Libya]
  • A. statusOfWatersClaimedByUS
    Indicates the legal or jurisdictional status assigned by the United States to specific bodies of water it claims.
  • B. underlyingWatercourseStatus
    Indicates the condition or state of the watercourse that lies beneath or is associated with another feature.
  • C. waterRight
    Indicates a legal or recognized entitlement that one party has to use or access water from a particular source under specified conditions.
  • D. waterwayStatus
    Indicates the current navigational or operational condition of a waterway, such as whether it is open, restricted, or closed for use.
  • E. permitsTestingTheWaters
    Indicates that one party allows another to explore or try something on a limited or provisional basis before making a full commitment.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224b1519081908b9db003fd2073e0 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe5d58c3e48190910aa3c23485e2c4 completed May 8, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe5c92090c8190bcfa412c0a3619df completed May 8, 2026, 9:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe5d580d7c819097cb18d438b01d08 completed May 8, 2026, 10:02 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:40 p.m.