Triple
T30770748
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gulf of Sirte |
E783515
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasClaimedAs |
P34338
|
FINISHED |
| Object | internal waters by Libya |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: internal waters by Libya | Statement: [Gulf of Sirte, wasClaimedAs, internal waters by Libya]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasClaimedAs Context triple: [Gulf of Sirte, wasClaimedAs, internal waters by Libya]
-
A.
claimedAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity asserts ownership, authorship, responsibility, or some other form of association over another entity.
-
B.
alsoClaimedAs
Indicates that an entity is asserted to have an additional, alternative, or parallel claim or designation beyond its primary one.
-
C.
claimedFor
Indicates that one entity has asserted ownership, responsibility, or entitlement over or on behalf of another entity.
-
D.
usedToClaim
Indicates that something is employed as evidence, justification, or support in making a particular claim.
-
E.
alsoClaimedBy
Indicates that the same item, statement, or resource is asserted or claimed by an additional party besides the primary one.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b1519081908b9db003fd2073e0 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68fc1913081909b621a90cb555115 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f686140aa08190a35f62572b2db9b6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:40 p.m.