Triple
T30767216
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Jersey–Delaware border |
E783406
|
entity |
| Predicate | highestCourtCase |
P182847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | New Jersey v. Delaware (1934) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: New Jersey v. Delaware (1934) | Statement: [New Jersey–Delaware border, highestCourtCase, New Jersey v. Delaware (1934)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: highestCourtCase Context triple: [New Jersey–Delaware border, highestCourtCase, New Jersey v. Delaware (1934)]
-
A.
highestCourtType
Indicates the type or category of the supreme or top-level court that has ultimate judicial authority over a given jurisdiction or case.
-
B.
highestCourtOf
Indicates that one entity is the supreme judicial authority or top-level court within the jurisdiction or legal system of another entity.
-
C.
highestCourtOfAppealFor
Indicates that one entity serves as the ultimate judicial authority to which decisions from the other entity can be appealed.
-
D.
previousHighestCourtOfAppeal
Indicates that one court previously served as the highest court of appeal for another jurisdiction or legal system.
-
E.
highestAuditCourt
Indicates that one entity serves as the supreme or top-level audit court responsible for overseeing the financial or administrative auditing of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b047f48190b4f5efeb7ee97b37 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f794f24e588190965e39b77534d53f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:33 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f791033d288190b118029fe412b9c9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:16 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f791cad5e08190a8a04ca283dbecaa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:40 p.m.