Triple
T30762669
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | What Remains |
E783274
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAuthorPhotographer |
P88841
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sally Mann |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sally Mann | Statement: [What Remains, hasAuthorPhotographer, Sally Mann]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAuthorPhotographer Context triple: [What Remains, hasAuthorPhotographer, Sally Mann]
-
A.
hasAuthorPhotographerRelationshipWithSubject
Indicates that an entity, acting as a photographer, has created or captured images of another entity, which serves as the photographic subject.
-
B.
hasPhotographBy
chosen
Indicates that an entity is depicted in or associated with a photograph that was created or taken by a specified photographer.
-
C.
hasParentWhoIsPhotographer
Indicates that an entity has at least one parent whose profession or role is that of a photographer.
-
D.
hasPhotographedFor
Indicates that one entity has taken photographs on behalf of, or as a service for, another entity.
-
E.
hasAuthor
Indicates that an entity is written or created by a specific author.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b047f48190b4f5efeb7ee97b37 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78fd5a6388190bfda4bbb2e222e5b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:39 p.m.