Triple
T30757265
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Laysan duck |
E783120
|
entity |
| Predicate | reproductionDependency |
P127493
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conservation management |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conservation management | Statement: [Laysan duck, reproductionDependency, conservation management]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reproductionDependency Context triple: [Laysan duck, reproductionDependency, conservation management]
-
A.
reproductionDependsOn
chosen
Indicates that the ability of one entity to reproduce is contingent upon the presence, condition, or actions of another entity.
-
B.
reproductionConstraint
Indicates a limitation, condition, or rule that restricts or governs how reproduction or generative processes may occur between entities.
-
C.
reproductionIncludes
Indicates that a broader reproductive process or category encompasses or contains a specific reproductive component, method, or event.
-
D.
hasReproduction
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a particular mode, process, or capability of reproduction.
-
E.
hasReproductionType
Indicates the mode or method by which an entity reproduces or generates offspring.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b047f48190b4f5efeb7ee97b37 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f9887888190b67348ab0035412b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b7b03488190b1db5fde4c7dd6e5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:39 p.m.