Triple
T30757143
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Physical (Dua Lipa song) |
E783117
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemixPerformer |
P200559
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hwa Sa |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hwa Sa | Statement: [Physical (Dua Lipa song), hasRemixPerformer, Hwa Sa]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemixPerformer Context triple: [Physical (Dua Lipa song), hasRemixPerformer, Hwa Sa]
-
A.
hasRemixArtistType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or role of artist responsible for creating a remix version of a work.
-
B.
hasRemixArtistDescriptor
Indicates that an entity has an associated descriptor specifying the artist responsible for a remix version of it.
-
C.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
-
D.
hasRemixer
chosen
Indicates that one entity has been remixed or reworked by another entity, identifying the remixer of the original.
-
E.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224b047f48190b4f5efeb7ee97b37 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00ae638fcc819096537b2c21366161 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00ae0551988190bcb3564ed9af2847 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 4:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:39 p.m.