Triple
T30745077
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Edwards v Canada (Attorney General) |
E782795
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canadian legal case |
C40476
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Canadian legal case Context triple: [Edwards v Canada (Attorney General), instanceOf, Canadian legal case]
-
A.
Canadian court case
chosen
A Canadian court case is a formal legal proceeding in which disputes or criminal charges are adjudicated by a court within Canada’s judicial system, resulting in a binding decision based on Canadian law.
-
B.
Canadian appellate court
A Canadian appellate court is a higher-level judicial body that reviews decisions of lower courts to ensure correct application of law and, where appropriate, modify or overturn those decisions.
-
C.
Canadian jurist
A Canadian jurist is a legal professional or scholar in Canada who interprets, applies, and develops the law through roles such as judge, legal academic, or senior practitioner.
-
D.
Canadian provincial legislation
Canadian provincial legislation comprises the body of laws enacted by provincial and territorial legislatures that govern matters within their constitutional jurisdictions, such as education, healthcare, property, and civil rights.
-
E.
Quebec provincial statute
A Quebec provincial statute is a law enacted by the National Assembly of Quebec that governs matters within the province’s constitutional jurisdiction, such as civil law, education, and language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224aeb1588190897d395e8ed2acb8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:38 p.m.