Triple
T30741550
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Muineachán |
E782701
|
entity |
| Predicate | isExonymOf |
P4705
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Monaghan (English name) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Monaghan (English name) | Statement: [Muineachán, isExonymOf, Monaghan (English name)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isExonymOf Context triple: [Muineachán, isExonymOf, Monaghan (English name)]
-
A.
hasExonym
chosen
Indicates that one entity is known by an alternative name or designation in another language or cultural context.
-
B.
hasDemonym
Indicates that one entity is the term (demonym) used to refer to the inhabitants or natives of another entity (typically a place).
-
C.
exonymStatus
Indicates the status or classification of a name used in one language to refer to a place, people, or entity known by a different name in its own language.
-
D.
administrativeDivisionOfDemonym
Indicates that a term is the demonym (name for residents) associated with a particular administrative division (such as a state, province, or region).
-
E.
usesDemonymForm
Indicates that one entity refers to another using a demonym form, i.e., a name derived from the inhabitants or nationality associated with that entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224aeb1588190897d395e8ed2acb8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f68da34819092a2e476e5f6ee05 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f686140aa08190a35f62572b2db9b6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:38 p.m.