Triple

T30740033
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kaiping Diaolou and Villages E782667 entity
Predicate numberOfDiaolou P202589 FINISHED
Object approximately 1800 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 1800 | Statement: [Kaiping Diaolou and Villages, numberOfDiaolou, approximately 1800]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: numberOfDiaolou
Context triple: [Kaiping Diaolou and Villages, numberOfDiaolou, approximately 1800]
  • A. numberOfDialogues
    Indicates the total count of dialogues associated with or occurring between the referenced entities.
  • B. hasDialogueTrees
    Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more branching dialogue structures that define possible conversational paths or interactions.
  • C. hasNumberOfDialects
    Indicates the relationship between a language (or linguistic entity) and the count of distinct dialects it possesses.
  • D. hasDialogueIn
    Indicates that an entity participates in or contains spoken or written dialogue within a specified context, such as a scene, work, or medium.
  • E. dialoguesBy
    Indicates that one entity is the creator, author, or source of the dialogues associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224aeb1588190897d395e8ed2acb8 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a009d623f6c8190b702e2892c52fbb2 completed May 10, 2026, 2:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a009a3050d48190b64567f28e6ea463 completed May 10, 2026, 2:46 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a009d6144d48190889bc704368d8878 completed May 10, 2026, 2:59 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:37 p.m.