Triple
T307389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Directions in Cryptography |
E6332
|
entity |
| Predicate | citedFor |
P9877
|
FINISHED |
| Object | introduction of public-key cryptography |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: introduction of public-key cryptography | Statement: [New Directions in Cryptography, citedFor, introduction of public-key cryptography]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citedFor Context triple: [New Directions in Cryptography, citedFor, introduction of public-key cryptography]
-
A.
citationBy
chosen
Indicates that one work is cited or referenced by another work.
-
B.
legalCitation
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
C.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
-
D.
appealsFrom
Indicates that a decision, judgment, or ruling is being challenged and taken to a higher authority or court for review.
-
E.
incorporatedByCase
Indicates that one legal case formally incorporates, adopts, or integrates the content, reasoning, or outcome of another case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79230508190b912ecb555aae17e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea313be88190b4441f3ea41a99e2 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e93f38308190b4b480c951f1a1c3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.