Triple

T30735956
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject N'Jobu E782553 entity
Predicate operatesAsUndercoverAgentIn P180713 FINISHED
Object United States NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States | Statement: [N'Jobu, operatesAsUndercoverAgentIn, United States]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: operatesAsUndercoverAgentIn
Context triple: [N'Jobu, operatesAsUndercoverAgentIn, United States]
  • A. undercoverOperationWith
    Indicates that one entity is engaged in a covert or clandestine operation in collaboration with another entity.
  • B. undercoverIn chosen
    Indicates that an entity is secretly operating within a group, organization, or environment under false or concealed identity.
  • C. undercoverFor
    Indicates that one entity is secretly acting on behalf of or within another entity, typically to gather information or carry out covert objectives without revealing their true affiliation.
  • D. undercoverAgainst
    Indicates that one entity is secretly acting in a covert or deceptive capacity directed against another entity.
  • E. resultOfUndercoverWork
    Indicates that something occurs as a consequence of, or is produced by, undercover investigative work.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224aeb1588190897d395e8ed2acb8 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff779e3f0c8190a861f1e4000fd9d9 completed May 9, 2026, 6:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff77202638819086e4b9f9c0bc7b31 completed May 9, 2026, 6:04 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:37 p.m.