Triple
T30734911
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Irving |
E782525
|
entity |
| Predicate | natoOrAlliedCodeNameFor |
P6062
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Nakajima J1N series |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Nakajima J1N series | Statement: [Irving, natoOrAlliedCodeNameFor, Nakajima J1N series]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: natoOrAlliedCodeNameFor Context triple: [Irving, natoOrAlliedCodeNameFor, Nakajima J1N series]
-
A.
alliedCodeName
Indicates that one entity is known or referred to by a specific code name within an allied or cooperative context.
-
B.
NATOcode
chosen
Indicates that there is a specified NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) code assigned to or associated with an entity.
-
C.
NATOname
Indicates that an entity has a specific official name as recognized or used by NATO.
-
D.
associatedWithNATO
Indicates a relationship in which an entity has a formal or recognized connection, affiliation, or involvement with NATO.
-
E.
alliedEquivalents
Indicates that two or more entities are considered equivalent or interchangeable within the context of an alliance or cooperative relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224aeb1588190897d395e8ed2acb8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68ee6761c8190af4e8de4f75b928b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f686140aa08190a35f62572b2db9b6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:37 p.m.