Triple

T30731169
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jordan–US Free Trade Agreement E782426 entity
Predicate enteredIntoForceBetween P176756 FINISHED
Object Jordan NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jordan | Statement: [Jordan–US Free Trade Agreement, enteredIntoForceBetween, Jordan]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enteredIntoForceBetween
Context triple: [Jordan–US Free Trade Agreement, enteredIntoForceBetween, Jordan]
  • A. enteredIntoForce
    Indicates that a law, treaty, agreement, or regulation has become legally effective and binding from a specific point in time.
  • B. enteredIntoForceIn
    Indicates that an agreement, law, or treaty became legally effective or operative in a specified place or jurisdiction.
  • C. enteredIntoForceBy
    Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally effective as a result of an action taken by a specified authority, event, or instrument.
  • D. enteredIntoForceInContextOf
    Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally binding and effective within a specified contextual framework, such as a particular jurisdiction, treaty system, or procedural setting.
  • E. enteredIntoForceWithInstrument
    Indicates that a legal agreement, treaty, or provision became legally binding through or upon the activation of a specific instrument (such as a protocol, act, or implementing document).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224ad9f9c81908e02a79ae0001137 completed April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6e6029a10819098ff21f58079e70e completed May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6e3d5e8188190b1e1c2e5d1b77031 completed May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6e60109648190947a64ca4ce81a3a completed May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:37 p.m.