Triple
T30722240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Carinhoso |
E782182
|
entity |
| Predicate | rhythmicOrigin |
P83538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | choro tradition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: choro tradition | Statement: [Carinhoso, rhythmicOrigin, choro tradition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rhythmicOrigin Context triple: [Carinhoso, rhythmicOrigin, choro tradition]
-
A.
hasRhythmicOrigin
Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on rhythm or rhythmic patterns.
-
B.
hasRhythmOrigin
chosen
Indicates that one rhythm, style, or rhythmic pattern originates from, is derived from, or has its roots in another source.
-
C.
rhythmicOrganization
Indicates how temporal patterns, accents, and durations are structured or arranged in relation to one another within a sequence or system.
-
D.
hasRhythmInfluence
Indicates that one entity has influenced or shaped the rhythmic patterns, style, or timing characteristics of another entity.
-
E.
sharesRhythmicFoundationWith
Indicates that two musical elements or pieces are based on the same or highly similar rhythmic pattern or underlying beat structure.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224acd24481908ed5f96f0d69b5dd |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68f670b608190a0b6ab60d722b4e0 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f68b7b03488190b1db5fde4c7dd6e5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:36 p.m.