Triple
T30714150
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dayton–Cincinnati metropolitan region |
E781975
|
entity |
| Predicate | economicCorridorBetween |
P104680
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cincinnati |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cincinnati | Statement: [Dayton–Cincinnati metropolitan region, economicCorridorBetween, Cincinnati]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: economicCorridorBetween Context triple: [Dayton–Cincinnati metropolitan region, economicCorridorBetween, Cincinnati]
-
A.
partOfEconomicCorridor
Indicates that one entity is included within, or constitutes a segment of, a larger defined economic corridor.
-
B.
shareEconomicCorridor
chosen
Indicates that two or more entities are connected by, or participate in, the same economic corridor for trade, transport, or development activities.
-
C.
hasEconomicCorridorRole
Indicates that an entity plays a specific functional or strategic role within an economic corridor.
-
D.
hasCommercialCorridorAlong
Indicates that a place contains a continuous stretch of commercial activity or businesses situated along a specified linear feature, such as a street or route.
-
E.
connectsToTransportCorridor
Indicates that one entity has a direct linkage or access route to a designated transport corridor (such as a road, rail line, or similar transit pathway).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224acd24481908ed5f96f0d69b5dd |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6d0d46aec819091edf97324d793ac |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6cfe2183481908ae4e85a59c66f69 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:35 p.m.