Triple
T3069712
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mini |
E63990
|
entity |
| Predicate | brandRevival |
P44242
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2001 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2001 | Statement: [Mini, brandRevival, 2001]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brandRevival Context triple: [Mini, brandRevival, 2001]
-
A.
brand
Indicates that one entity is the commercial brand or label under which another entity (such as a product, service, or organization) is marketed or identified.
-
B.
brandStrategy
Indicates the relationship in which a brand defines and guides how it will be positioned, communicated, and differentiated in the market to achieve its business goals.
-
C.
brandPositioning
Indicates how a brand is strategically placed and perceived in the minds of its target audience relative to competitors.
-
D.
brandingNote
Indicates that an entity has an associated note or comment specifically about its branding, such as style, usage, or presentation guidelines.
-
E.
brandingFeature
Indicates that one entity serves as a branding-related characteristic, element, or attribute that helps define or distinguish another entity’s brand identity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad857a8aec8190bfdfd9c14554ac5a |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ada100f0b8819095da366fdc6803a8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9624b7a0819091d255614f5819ea |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ad97f7630c81908e1ca8a69611cff6 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:38 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:02 p.m.