Triple

T30688369
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Will Estes E781248 entity
Predicate portraysOccupationAsCharacter P153983 FINISHED
Object NYPD officer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NYPD officer | Statement: [Will Estes, portraysOccupationAsCharacter, NYPD officer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: portraysOccupationAsCharacter
Context triple: [Will Estes, portraysOccupationAsCharacter, NYPD officer]
  • A. portrayedProfessionOfCharacter chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the profession or occupation depicted as being held by a particular character.
  • B. portraysProfession
    Indicates that one entity depicts or represents another entity in a specific profession or occupational role.
  • C. portrayedByProfession
    Indicates that an entity is depicted or represented by someone acting in a specified professional capacity.
  • D. portraysInWork
    Indicates that one entity depicts, represents, or plays the role of another entity within a specific creative work.
  • E. occupationAsPersona
    Indicates that an entity holds or performs a particular occupation specifically in the role or persona of another characterized identity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224a92f54819095499b4d32bd5134 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fda5003cdc8190a558501271389912 completed May 8, 2026, 8:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fda05bfc2c819096821a5300e9bb24 completed May 8, 2026, 8:35 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:33 p.m.