Triple

T30686281
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oklahoma City–Fort Worth E781193 entity
Predicate connectsToMetropolitanAreaInState P196542 FINISHED
Object Texas NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas | Statement: [Oklahoma City–Fort Worth, connectsToMetropolitanAreaInState, Texas]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectsToMetropolitanAreaInState
Context triple: [Oklahoma City–Fort Worth, connectsToMetropolitanAreaInState, Texas]
  • A. isWithinMetroArea
    Indicates that one location lies inside the geographic boundaries of a specified metropolitan area.
  • B. includesMajorMetropolitanArea
    Indicates that one entity geographically contains or encompasses a major metropolitan area within its boundaries.
  • C. operatesInMetropolitanArea
    Indicates that an entity conducts its activities or provides its services within a specified metropolitan area.
  • D. isMetropolitanArea
    Indicates that a given area functions as a major urban center and its surrounding region, typically characterized by high population density and integrated economic and social activities.
  • E. locatedNearMetropolitanArea
    Indicates that one entity is situated in close geographic proximity to a metropolitan (urban) area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224a92f54819095499b4d32bd5134 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe5c1a502081909d4024e514309c8e completed May 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe5a9df21c819087153f5d0bcaa987 completed May 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe5c196f4081908f150d4cd6c528fa completed May 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:33 p.m.