Triple
T30681261
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus |
E781056
|
entity |
| Predicate | loyalSupportFrom |
P18809
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gallic legions |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gallic legions | Statement: [Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, loyalSupportFrom, Gallic legions]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: loyalSupportFrom Context triple: [Marcus Cassianius Latinius Postumus, loyalSupportFrom, Gallic legions]
-
A.
isLoyalTo
Indicates that one entity consistently supports, respects, or remains faithful to another entity.
-
B.
supporterOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity backs, advocates for, or provides assistance to another entity, cause, or organization.
-
C.
hasSupportersIn
Indicates that an entity is backed or endorsed by people or groups located within a specified place or region.
-
D.
loyaltyAlliance
Indicates a committed, supportive alliance in which one party maintains steadfast loyalty to another.
-
E.
usedBySupporters
Indicates that something is utilized or employed by supporters of a person, group, cause, or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224a92f54819095499b4d32bd5134 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68b806a1081909fbd1b301a6936a4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6861170d08190bb98be609d436f84 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:32 p.m.