Triple
T30680674
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | law of diminishing returns |
E781042
|
entity |
| Predicate | violatedIf |
P166960
|
FINISHED |
| Object | technological improvements occur with additional input |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: technological improvements occur with additional input | Statement: [law of diminishing returns, violatedIf, technological improvements occur with additional input]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: violatedIf Context triple: [law of diminishing returns, violatedIf, technological improvements occur with additional input]
-
A.
violationOf
Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
-
B.
assertedViolationOf
Indicates that one party has formally claimed or alleged that a rule, law, standard, or obligation has been violated.
-
C.
violatedPrinciple
Indicates that an entity has broken, disregarded, or acted contrary to a specified rule, norm, or guiding principle.
-
D.
wouldViolate
chosen
Indicates that performing the specified action or condition would break, infringe, or be inconsistent with a given rule, constraint, or obligation.
-
E.
showedNotViolatedIn
Indicates that something has been demonstrated or proven to remain unviolated or intact within a particular context, setting, or situation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224a92f54819095499b4d32bd5134 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68b7fadd88190a17b92b09ddb6f11 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6861170d08190bb98be609d436f84 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:32 p.m.