Triple
T30645347
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lay magistrates |
E780103
|
entity |
| Predicate | cannotSitInCasesInvolving |
P140086
|
FINISHED |
| Object | close relatives or personal acquaintances |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: close relatives or personal acquaintances | Statement: [Lay magistrates, cannotSitInCasesInvolving, close relatives or personal acquaintances]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: cannotSitInCasesInvolving Context triple: [Lay magistrates, cannotSitInCasesInvolving, close relatives or personal acquaintances]
-
A.
cannotHearCasesFrom
Indicates that one entity lacks the authority or ability to hear, consider, or adjudicate cases originating from another entity.
-
B.
cannotSit
chosen
Indicates that an entity is unable or not allowed to sit on, in, or at another entity.
-
C.
canSitWithout
Indicates that one entity is able to sit without the presence, support, or assistance of another entity.
-
D.
maySitAs
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to serve or participate in an official capacity within another entity (such as a body, panel, or role).
-
E.
maySitEnBanc
Indicates that a judicial body has the authority or option to convene and hear a case with all (or a large majority of) its judges sitting together as a full court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224a50ebc81909b961a94c7f66b12 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b967d5308190bbb66d0a8dd52612 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b6293188819080d5041ca0adb969 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:29 p.m.