Triple
T30644959
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Civil Division of the Court of Appeal |
E780094
|
entity |
| Predicate | requiresForFurtherAppeal |
P50256
|
FINISHED |
| Object | permission to appeal to the Supreme Court |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: permission to appeal to the Supreme Court | Statement: [Civil Division of the Court of Appeal, requiresForFurtherAppeal, permission to appeal to the Supreme Court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: requiresForFurtherAppeal Context triple: [Civil Division of the Court of Appeal, requiresForFurtherAppeal, permission to appeal to the Supreme Court]
-
A.
requiresLeaveToAppeal
chosen
Indicates that a party must obtain formal permission from a higher court before proceeding with an appeal.
-
B.
decisionSubjectToAppealOn
Indicates that a particular decision is open to being challenged or reviewed through an appeal process.
-
C.
requiresCourtToConsider
Indicates that one party or condition obligates the court to take a specific factor, issue, or information into account when making its decision.
-
D.
appealBasis
Indicates the grounds, reasons, or legal basis on which an appeal is made.
-
E.
reasonForAppealDecision
Indicates the justification or grounds cited for making a particular appeal decision.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224a50ebc81909b961a94c7f66b12 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe2f078c24819082ba396b56f02808 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe228fe1988190baf3bb34897f3dbe |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:29 p.m.