Triple

T30632305
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nitin Sawhney E779742 entity
Predicate appointedCBE P183508 FINISHED
Object 2019 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2019 | Statement: [Nitin Sawhney, appointedCBE, 2019]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: appointedCBE
Context triple: [Nitin Sawhney, appointedCBE, 2019]
  • A. appointedAs
    Indicates that one entity is formally assigned or designated to hold a specific role, position, or title in relation to another entity.
  • B. appointedWith
    Indicates that one entity has been formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • C. appointedFrom
    Indicates that an entity was selected or assigned to a position or role originating from a specified source, body, or prior position.
  • D. appointedIn
    Indicates that an entity is formally assigned or designated to a role, position, or office within a specific context, organization, or jurisdiction.
  • E. appointedThrough
    Indicates that an entity attained a position, role, or status by means of a specific appointing process, mechanism, or intermediary.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224a431548190a44ad9d088dbf91f completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7a01efcc08190bba489a9099b8684 completed May 3, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f79e4888248190be2f63cdfb5cd7b7 completed May 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f79f477c4c8190a35cb6d87b1dcbd1 completed May 3, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:28 p.m.