Triple
T30610278
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | High Commission Territories in Southern Africa |
E779159
|
entity |
| Predicate | independenceSequence |
P19534
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Bechuanaland Protectorate became Botswana |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bechuanaland Protectorate became Botswana | Statement: [High Commission Territories in Southern Africa, independenceSequence, Bechuanaland Protectorate became Botswana]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: independenceSequence Context triple: [High Commission Territories in Southern Africa, independenceSequence, Bechuanaland Protectorate became Botswana]
-
A.
independenceProcess
chosen
Indicates a process or sequence of actions through which an entity becomes or is made independent from another controlling or influencing entity.
-
B.
independenceConsolidated
Indicates that an entity’s independence has been firmly established and secured, transitioning from a fragile or emerging state to a stable, recognized condition.
-
C.
independenceFrom
Indicates that one entity is not controlled, governed, or significantly influenced by another entity.
-
D.
independenceProvedBy
Indicates that the independence of something (such as a statement, axiom, or system) is established or demonstrated by a particular proof, method, or agent.
-
E.
usesSequence
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a specific ordered sequence of elements, steps, or events in performing an action or defining a relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224a21fc08190abd9d8dd9eb6bb4c |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68a16debc8190a12f5f65ced055d7 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6860def1c81909d79e1f088c4b5e5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:26 p.m.