Triple

T30600183
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kingdom of Dale E778882 entity
Predicate hasDefensiveAlliancesWith P136406 FINISHED
Object Erebor NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Erebor | Statement: [Kingdom of Dale, hasDefensiveAlliancesWith, Erebor]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDefensiveAlliancesWith
Context triple: [Kingdom of Dale, hasDefensiveAlliancesWith, Erebor]
  • A. involvesAlliance
    Indicates that there exists a cooperative or strategic alliance relationship between the referenced entities.
  • B. hasBrokenAllianceWith
    Indicates that a previously established alliance or partnership between two entities has been ended or violated by at least one of them.
  • C. alliesOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is in a cooperative, supportive, or mutually beneficial alliance with another entity.
  • D. alliesIncluded
    Indicates that the specified set or group explicitly includes one or more allied entities as members.
  • E. vassalOrAllyOf
    Indicates that one entity is subordinate to, dependent on, or formally aligned in support of another entity, typically in a hierarchical or cooperative political or military relationship.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224a1570c8190a85d3ac330479a79 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdd92396788190ae1424bc1ae55844 completed May 8, 2026, 12:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdd678f40481909a717a2daec83b36 completed May 8, 2026, 12:26 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:25 p.m.