Triple

T30588574
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Isin-Larsa period E778584 entity
Predicate hasLegalDevelopment P191358 FINISHED
Object Lipit-Ishtar law code NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lipit-Ishtar law code | Statement: [Isin-Larsa period, hasLegalDevelopment, Lipit-Ishtar law code]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalDevelopment
Context triple: [Isin-Larsa period, hasLegalDevelopment, Lipit-Ishtar law code]
  • A. hasLegalStatus
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
  • B. hasLegalRight
    Indicates that an entity possesses an officially recognized legal entitlement or permission to perform an action or hold a claim regarding another entity.
  • C. hasLegalPosition
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific legal role, status, or standing within a legal framework or proceeding.
  • D. hasLegalResponse
    Indicates that an entity has an associated legal reply, action, or measure taken in response to a legal situation, claim, or requirement.
  • E. legalIn
    Indicates that an action, status, or entity is permitted or valid under the laws or regulations of a specified jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224a04b248190b0ca443ec86207b8 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcdf2394748190b35cead3e208447d completed May 7, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcdbe344ec8190a0471911952f4b82 completed May 7, 2026, 6:37 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcdf22ab8881908b257f16522920c5 completed May 7, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:24 p.m.