Triple

T30578526
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Azimjan Askarov E778316 entity
Predicate detentionAllegations P83746 FINISHED
Object torture in custody LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: torture in custody | Statement: [Azimjan Askarov, detentionAllegations, torture in custody]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: detentionAllegations
Context triple: [Azimjan Askarov, detentionAllegations, torture in custody]
  • A. detainsUnder
    Indicates that one entity holds another in custody or confinement under a specific legal authority, provision, or condition.
  • B. hasAllegationsOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is accused or suspected of engaging in certain actions, behaviors, or misconduct, but without implying that these accusations are proven.
  • C. deniedAllegations
    Indicates that one party has rejected or refuted specific accusations made against them.
  • D. detentionWithoutCharge
    Indicates that an entity is being held in custody by authorities without having formal charges filed against them.
  • E. detentionEvent
    Indicates an event in which an entity is formally held, confined, or kept in custody, typically by an authority, for a period of time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224a04b248190b0ca443ec86207b8 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f689406a2c8190bd9b1fe2813478a5 completed May 2, 2026, 11:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f67e42d6688190b60e91d2c388c555 completed May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:23 p.m.