Triple
T30566816
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Glow Worm |
E778003
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasEnduringAppealIn |
P121454
|
FINISHED |
| Object | traditional pop music |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: traditional pop music | Statement: [Glow Worm, hasEnduringAppealIn, traditional pop music]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEnduringAppealIn Context triple: [Glow Worm, hasEnduringAppealIn, traditional pop music]
-
A.
hasEnduringAppeal
chosen
Indicates that something continues to attract interest, admiration, or enjoyment over a long period of time.
-
B.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
C.
hasMassAppeal
Indicates that something possesses qualities or characteristics that attract or are appealing to a very large, broad, or general audience.
-
D.
hasOngoingLegalSignificance
Indicates that a legal matter, status, or decision continues to have current relevance, effect, or consequences under the law.
-
E.
hasCrossoverAppeal
Indicates that something attracts or appeals to multiple distinct groups, genres, or audiences beyond its original or primary category.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2249ed41c8190b175170ecfd6e1c5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b5ccbda481908fe1945c35e36ce8 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b4c06f5881908f0b98cad6796478 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:21 p.m.