Triple
T30558828
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 勝也 |
E777775
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAlsoBeWritten |
P12679
|
FINISHED |
| Object | in kana (phonetic Japanese scripts) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: in kana (phonetic Japanese scripts) | Statement: [勝也, canAlsoBeWritten, in kana (phonetic Japanese scripts)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAlsoBeWritten Context triple: [勝也, canAlsoBeWritten, in kana (phonetic Japanese scripts)]
-
A.
canBeWrittenIn
chosen
Indicates that something is capable of being expressed, encoded, or represented using a particular language, notation, or medium.
-
B.
canAlsoBe
Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
-
C.
writable
Indicates that one entity has permission or capability to modify or write data to another entity.
-
D.
likelyWrittenFrom
Indicates that something (such as a text, statement, or perspective) is probably authored or expressed from the viewpoint, context, or position of a particular entity.
-
E.
isWritten
Indicates that a text, document, or content has been created or recorded in written form by an agent.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2249ed41c8190b175170ecfd6e1c5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f688d72a60819094fe4a3b8bbb5ac4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e42d6688190b60e91d2c388c555 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:21 p.m.