Triple
T30557306
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indian Army cantonment system |
E777733
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPredecessorLaw |
P96973
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cantonments Act, 1924 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cantonments Act, 1924 | Statement: [Indian Army cantonment system, hasPredecessorLaw, Cantonments Act, 1924]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPredecessorLaw Context triple: [Indian Army cantonment system, hasPredecessorLaw, Cantonments Act, 1924]
-
A.
predecessorLawEnforced
Indicates that a law was actively enforced before and up to the point when another, subsequent law came into effect.
-
B.
predecessorLawModified
Indicates that a law has been modified by a subsequent law that directly follows it in the legislative sequence.
-
C.
predecessorLegalBasis
chosen
Indicates that one legal basis directly precedes and forms the prior legal foundation for another legal basis.
-
D.
hasPredecessorMP
Indicates that one member of parliament previously held the same parliamentary position or seat before another member of parliament.
-
E.
predecessorRegulation
Indicates that one regulation directly precedes and is replaced or superseded by another regulation in a legal or regulatory sequence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2249ed41c8190b175170ecfd6e1c5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fff59a00a881909b35b799654b3c45 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fff4d0a2e081909c972189b33d0128 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 3 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:21 p.m.