Triple
T30544273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1935 Canadian federal election |
E777367
|
entity |
| Predicate | leaderOfLosingParty |
P130505
|
FINISHED |
| Object | R. B. Bennett |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R. B. Bennett | Statement: [1935 Canadian federal election, leaderOfLosingParty, R. B. Bennett]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: leaderOfLosingParty Context triple: [1935 Canadian federal election, leaderOfLosingParty, R. B. Bennett]
-
A.
popularVoteLoserParty
Indicates that the subject is the political party of a candidate who lost the popular vote in an election.
-
B.
leadingCandidateOfDefeatedParty
chosen
Indicates that an individual is the primary or most prominent candidate of a political party that has lost an election or contest.
-
C.
popularVoteLoser
Indicates that the subject became the winner of an election despite receiving fewer popular votes than at least one opponent.
-
D.
headOfLosingCoalition
Indicates that the subject is the leader or primary representative of a coalition that has lost in a competitive or adversarial context.
-
E.
loserCoalition
Indicates a coalition of entities that collectively fail to win or achieve a desired outcome in a competitive or decision-making context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2249d183c8190b79937c1768d2163 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7117e55908190a67105e92bc4830f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f380690819090cc34763ba460ed |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:19 p.m.