Triple
T30517913
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ACSI |
E776614
|
entity |
| Predicate | logicalCompatibilityWith |
P169810
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SCSI |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SCSI | Statement: [ACSI, logicalCompatibilityWith, SCSI]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicalCompatibilityWith Context triple: [ACSI, logicalCompatibilityWith, SCSI]
-
A.
claimsCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity asserts it is compatible or can work harmoniously with another entity.
-
B.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
C.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
-
D.
compatibleSign
Indicates that two entities are considered astrologically harmonious or well-matched based on their zodiac signs.
-
E.
projectionCompatibility
Indicates that two or more projections (such as views, mappings, or representations) are mutually consistent and can be combined or used together without conflict.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2249b23c4819087fa85496d92f43f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6880865d88190b3eeaf9478d4d6bd |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e42d6688190b60e91d2c388c555 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6827a7b9c8190ab13605aacc81df9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:16 p.m.