Triple
T30502267
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Exchange Traded Commodity |
E776166
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCostComponent |
P20937
|
FINISHED |
| Object | management fee |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: management fee | Statement: [Exchange Traded Commodity, hasCostComponent, management fee]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCostComponent Context triple: [Exchange Traded Commodity, hasCostComponent, management fee]
-
A.
hasCost
Indicates that one entity requires a specified amount of resources (such as money, time, or effort) to be obtained, used, or maintained by another entity.
-
B.
hasMonetaryComponent
chosen
Indicates that something includes, involves, or is associated with a monetary or financial element.
-
C.
tieneComisiones
Indicates that an entity is associated with or subject to commissions, such as fees or percentage-based charges.
-
D.
hasCharge
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific electrical or formal charge, such as positive, negative, or neutral.
-
E.
increasedCostFor
Indicates that one entity causes or experiences a rise in the cost associated with another entity or activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22498c5d481908aaea89e6fab8280 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0154b16a3c8190b808a460ae3a91ac |
completed | May 11, 2026, 4:01 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a01539f19d88190b2de63f5262b1074 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 3:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:15 p.m.