Triple
T30497148
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | "Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice" |
E776036
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | philosophical remark |
C13891
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: philosophical remark Context triple: ["Hegel remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice", instanceOf, philosophical remark]
-
A.
philosophical aphorism
chosen
A philosophical aphorism is a brief, pithy statement that expresses a general truth or insight about existence, knowledge, or values in a memorable and thought-provoking way.
-
B.
philosophical commentary
Philosophical commentary is a reflective, critical discourse that interprets, analyzes, and evaluates philosophical ideas, texts, or arguments to clarify their meaning, implications, and coherence.
-
C.
philosophical proposition
A philosophical proposition is a declarative statement that expresses a claim about reality, knowledge, value, or meaning, which can be analyzed, debated, and evaluated for its truth, coherence, or implications.
-
D.
philosophical section
A philosophical section is a distinct part of a text or discourse that systematically explores, analyzes, and argues about abstract concepts, theories, or questions concerning existence, knowledge, values, reason, or meaning.
-
E.
philosophical interpretation
A philosophical interpretation is a conceptual framework that explains, clarifies, or recontextualizes ideas, texts, or phenomena in terms of underlying philosophical assumptions, theories, and arguments.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22498c5d481908aaea89e6fab8280 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:14 p.m.