Triple

T30496764
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Quebec Court of Appeal E776026 entity
Predicate hearsAppealsAsOfRightIn P106625 FINISHED
Object certain criminal matters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: certain criminal matters | Statement: [Quebec Court of Appeal, hearsAppealsAsOfRightIn, certain criminal matters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hearsAppealsAsOfRightIn
Context triple: [Quebec Court of Appeal, hearsAppealsAsOfRightIn, certain criminal matters]
  • A. hearsAppealsIn chosen
    Indicates that a judicial body has the authority to review and decide appeals within a specified jurisdiction or court.
  • B. hearsAppealsBy
    Indicates that one party has the authority or role to review and decide on appeals submitted by another party.
  • C. hearsAppealsAgainst
    Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers appeals challenging the decisions or actions of another entity.
  • D. hearsAppealTo
    Indicates that one entity formally reviews and considers an appeal submitted by another entity.
  • E. hearsForHigherCourt
    Indicates that a lower court conducts proceedings or hears a case on behalf of, or for the consideration of, a higher court.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22498c5d481908aaea89e6fab8280 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6877beac8819088e18617985213a8 completed May 2, 2026, 11:23 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678d2196c8190b9d0d2fcd47cc539 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:14 p.m.