Triple
T30489836
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Flying Nun |
E775826
|
entity |
| Predicate | causeOfAbility |
P180889
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lightweight frame and winged habit |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lightweight frame and winged habit | Statement: [The Flying Nun, causeOfAbility, lightweight frame and winged habit]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: causeOfAbility Context triple: [The Flying Nun, causeOfAbility, lightweight frame and winged habit]
-
A.
believedToHaveAbility
Indicates that one entity is thought or assumed to possess a particular capability or power, without asserting that the ability is actually verified.
-
B.
causeOfDisability
Indicates that one entity is the reason or source that brings about another entity’s disability.
-
C.
claimedAbility
Indicates that an entity asserts or reports having a particular ability, regardless of whether that ability is actually possessed or demonstrated.
-
D.
abilityDescribedAs
Indicates that an ability is characterized or expressed using a particular description or phrasing.
-
E.
hadAbility
Indicates that an entity possessed a particular capability, skill, or power, either inherently or at a given time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22497f91c8190afa7165bc900accd |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f757898fe48190b124dc7301672623 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f754c484348190948d2a04ff228fb1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f75788d40c819083bf2567b3091585 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:13 p.m.