Triple

T30487680
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hardware City E775764 entity
Predicate usedAsMarketingSlogan P89151 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Hardware City, usedAsMarketingSlogan, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usedAsMarketingSlogan
Context triple: [Hardware City, usedAsMarketingSlogan, yes]
  • A. usedAsMarketingTaglineFor
    Indicates that something is employed as a promotional slogan or catchphrase to market a particular product, service, brand, or entity.
  • B. sloganUsedIn
    Indicates that a particular slogan is employed or featured within a specific context, such as a campaign, advertisement, or organization.
  • C. sloganUsedBy
    Indicates that a particular slogan is employed or adopted by a specific entity (such as a person, organization, or brand) in its communication or branding.
  • D. usedAsMarketingTitleIn
    Indicates that something serves as a marketing title or promotional label within a specified context or medium.
  • E. hasAdvertisingSlogan chosen
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular advertising slogan as part of its promotional or branding activities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22497f91c8190afa7165bc900accd completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd2839880c819099a7a89783f2270e completed May 8, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd23dc5da48190ae8ba08947d34956 completed May 7, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:13 p.m.