Triple

T30472711
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Néracais E775347 entity
Predicate belongsToLinguisticType P196080 FINISHED
Object gentilic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: gentilic | Statement: [Néracais, belongsToLinguisticType, gentilic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: belongsToLinguisticType
Context triple: [Néracais, belongsToLinguisticType, gentilic]
  • A. belongsToLinguisticRegion
    Indicates that one linguistic entity (such as a language, dialect, or speech variety) is associated with or situated within a particular linguistic region or area.
  • B. linguisticType
    Indicates the type or category of language or linguistic system associated with an entity (e.g., spoken, signed, written, or other linguistic modality).
  • C. hasLinguisticVariationType
    Indicates that one linguistic form is related to another by a specific type of variation, such as dialectal, orthographic, morphological, or phonological difference.
  • D. hasLinguisticAffiliation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with or belongs to a particular language or linguistic group.
  • E. hasLinguisticDataType
    Indicates that something is associated with or characterized by a specific type or category of linguistic data.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22497341481909c21ba329fadaa6b completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe066d62b48190867df334039be786 completed May 8, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe03afde3c8190a5b9b0778d19eb1a completed May 8, 2026, 3:39 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe066b623c819085205fbea901e3cf completed May 8, 2026, 3:51 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:11 p.m.