Triple

T3045754
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ulpia Noviomagus Batavorum E83441 entity
Predicate hasTypeSiteFor P44791 FINISHED
Object Batavian Roman urbanism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Batavian Roman urbanism | Statement: [Ulpia Noviomagus Batavorum, hasTypeSiteFor, Batavian Roman urbanism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeSiteFor
Context triple: [Ulpia Noviomagus Batavorum, hasTypeSiteFor, Batavian Roman urbanism]
  • A. containsSite
    Indicates that one entity spatially or structurally includes another entity as a site or location within its bounds.
  • B. haveType
    Indicates that an entity belongs to or is classified under a specified type or category.
  • C. coversTypeOfSite
    Indicates that one entity provides coverage or applies to a particular category or type of site.
  • D. hasTypeSystem
    Indicates that an entity employs, is governed by, or is associated with a particular type system (a defined set of rules for classifying and constraining types).
  • E. isSiteSpecific
    Indicates that something is designed, intended, or valid only for a particular location, context, or site and does not generally apply elsewhere.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b24924c8190a9bb6f61d519e4ae completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9bab541c8190a17aca26b3dcfae7 completed March 8, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad961fc62c819087c4c3a44b00847d completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ad97f6af3881909f4547967384114c completed March 8, 2026, 3:38 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:01 p.m.