Triple

T3043193
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stephen Cook E83179 entity
Predicate knownFor P22 FINISHED
Object Cook–Levin theorem E173625 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cook–Levin theorem | Statement: [Stephen Cook, knownFor, Cook–Levin theorem]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cook–Levin theorem
Context triple: [Stephen Cook, knownFor, Cook–Levin theorem]
  • A. PCP theorem
    The PCP theorem is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory stating that every problem in NP has probabilistically checkable proofs that can be verified by examining only a constant number of bits, with major implications for the hardness of approximation.
  • B. P versus NP problem
    The P versus NP problem is a central unsolved question in theoretical computer science that asks whether every problem whose solution can be quickly verified by a computer can also be quickly solved by a computer.
  • C. Entscheidungsproblem
    The Entscheidungsproblem is a foundational decision problem in mathematical logic that asks whether there exists a general algorithm to determine the truth or falsity of any given first-order logical statement.
  • D. Håstad’s switching lemma
    Håstad’s switching lemma is a fundamental result in computational complexity theory that provides powerful bounds on the simplification of Boolean formulas under random restrictions, with major applications in circuit lower bounds.
  • E. NP-completeness chosen
    NP-completeness is a central concept in computational complexity theory that classifies decision problems believed to be among the hardest in NP, such that a polynomial-time solution to any one of them would yield polynomial-time solutions to all problems in NP.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b2298908190a7cb4e9bdbf064d0 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9b5d2a308190b4ce20efcae9b761 completed March 8, 2026, 3:53 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b1ded35e008190be7dd72aa7537a3b completed March 11, 2026, 9:29 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:01 p.m.